Backrooms

 

This review may contain spoilers!

Backrooms follows Clark, a furniture outlet store owner who discovers a secret entrance into a mysterious liminal space within his store. This unusual space goes on infinitely and holds dark secrets within. Backrooms is directed by Kane Parsons, who developed the Backrooms internet mythology into a famous YouTube web series.

Everything that really works for this horror feature is all on display in that first half. The Backrooms starts off incredibly strong, with some very desolate and desperate characters searching for more than what they are. Clark is a miserable furniture store owner who holds a lot of contempt for the wife who left him and who can't reconcile that he hasn't achieved his dreams. He tries to avail himself through therapy, where the mask of his inner rage occasionally slips. But having no other outlet, Clark desperately staggers through a life spent propping up a failing business. His discovery of this other place, these backrooms, is an absolutely thrilling tilt in the story. Clark's wonder is our own, as he goes further and grows in fascination, the audience becomes more tense. You can't help but wait for that other shoe to drop, for some darker presence to lash out at him. Clark's obsession sees him continuing to risk the backrooms, drawn further and further into this mysterious other place. He risks the lives of his employees and himself; everything is consumed by this newfound purpose. By the end of the feature, we see Clark as a wretched figure, unable to grow from his own narcissism and living in the backrooms to feel a sense of control in this space.

This is a film that is completely dedicated to its design. The way this feature is shot is really powerful. Kane Parsons manages to capture everyday spaces and pieces of urban architecture and make them compelling moments in a frame. I loved the claustrophobia generated in the practical set of the backrooms; that whole environment transported me. The score is a real unsettling piece of ambience; it sinks into you slowly and draws forth a feeling of unease.

Renate Reinsve, who played Mary, is quite good at portraying a stoic, professional therapist; Reinsve's final confrontation with Ejiofor contrasted with their therapy sessions are some excellent examples of great acting.

However, the best performance came from Chiwetel Ejiofor, who played Clark. Ejiofor is really fantastic at finding a character and bringing them right down to Earth. Clark isn't always the most likable figure, nor is he reprehensible at first. This is a deeply flawed individual, with a lot of rage and hurt. He is alone in life and completely dejected over the idea that this is the quality of his life. It's a figure sculpted to be tragic; he can fix himself, but he refuses to do so. Watching Ejiofor play to the wonder and fear of the backrooms was quite thrilling. Yet, it's Clark's final scenes where Ejiofor gets to unmask the darkness at Clark's centre that is most unsettling. It's a difficult character journey to watch, to see Ejiofor grow rotten, but it is masterfully played.

It's hard to tell a good story from beginning to end, especially one overladen with pre-existing lore and expectation. What do you take with you? What will your average movie-going audience relate to? Seeing Osgood Perkins' producing credit tacked onto this was probably warning enough that this would walk off the beaten path at some point. At the halfway point of the feature, we lose sight of Clark, leaving his story behind for his therapist, Mary. This is a character we've gotten glancing pieces of throughout the film. Mary has her own horrific backstory, and we get it randomly littered throughout. It's unusual in delivery and often interrupts the pacing rather than adding to the flow of the narrative. The film doesn't care if Mary works as the new protagonist; she is unceremoniously dumped with a baton to lead the feature. She then proceeds to get to the backrooms in quite a clunky way, all while the audience is left trying to puzzle out the time disparity that has taken place. Clark's descent into madness is well performed by Ejiofor, but it is a massive character leap. His madness feels sudden, not really earned by the story. This is a common issue with Backrooms; it surges forward in pacing all the time. The fact that the final half descends into a creature feature is a disappointment. It renders what was a great piece of horror into a pretty simplistic run-of-the-mill scare that we see from the big studios all the time. The monster, just being a raging, yet pathetic version of Clark's inner demons, felt quite heavy-handed. The clandestine corporation that lurked throughout the feature was like a brick to the structure of the film. A shadowy corporation just sucked the air out of the personal journey of these characters. Ending the film on Mary being interviewed by Phil was the perfect off-note to cut to the credits on.

The pirate Clark monster we get in the final act is a complete shambolic mess. It's only particularly frightening when things descend into jump scares. I cannot begin to describe how hilarious and average the design of this thing is. It kills the potential of Backrooms almost exclusively.

Mark Duplass, who played Phil, really kills the ending of the feature; Duplass' tired interview completely collapses any sensation of excitement remaining. Finn Bennett and Lukita Maxwell, who played Bobby and Kat respectively, don't ever really get to develop into more than two-dimensional characters; these young performers are merely here for a fatality.

Maybe we just leave this one in the back. I would give Backrooms a 4.5/10

Star Wars: The Mandalorian And Grogu

 

This review may contain spoilers!

Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu is the film spinoff from The Mandalorian Disney+ TV show. In this feature, Din Djarin and Grogu embark on a mission to capture ex-Imperial warlords for the New Republic.

Back when The Mandalorian came out, it managed to do something new for Star Wars, providing that wilder spaghetti western feel and really immersing the viewer in the world of Star Wars once again. I think that's what I like most about a Mando and Grogu adventure: the stakes are always high for our characters, but this isn't about the fate of the galaxy balancing on a knife's edge. This is about a couple of smaller figures doing some good within the galaxy. The Mandalorian and Grogu manages to take the material back to its bounty hunter roots, racing our protagonists through some incredible action set pieces as they bring the dregs of the Empire to justice. It's adventurous, filled with good humour and has a central bond that families are going to find very sweet. As a Star Wars fan who has tried his best to consume every little piece of Star Wars media there is, I was also delighted at some of the little details scattered throughout this. There's something a lot more grounded about following Mando around; the stakes are higher because he doesn't have a laser sword and the Force. He's just as likely to die as the bad guy shooting back at him. There is a moment in this film in which Grogu must step up for Din, while the Mandalorian flits between life and death. It's a great moment in the story that shows how Grogu has grown as a character and has even learned from Mando to survive himself.

Jon Favreau and the creative team behind The Mandalorian have grown quite adept at making a very strong visual out of this character and the way he moves through the galaxy. If anything, this film returns us to the showy framing, the grittier action and moments of full-scale awe that the third season lacked somewhat. The special effects only serve to bolster this, with whole alien cultures looking brilliant, paired with droids and alien weapons blasting at one another. I loved that the puppet and effects of Grogu have also grown to be a bit more expressive across this journey; Grogu felt extremely defined in this. However, the best quality of this film is the score. Ludwig Göransson already shook up the game when he first began on The Mandalorian, but what he achieves here is something next level. Rotta the Hutt's character theme is out of this world.

Sigourney Weaver, who played Colonel Ward, is a very dry-humoured figure of authority here; Weaver seems at home helming a Republic X-Wing and barking orders. Jeremy Allen White, who voiced Rotta the Hutt, is a very charismatic and sympathetic take on a Hutt; I enjoyed Allen White's capture of a young character who wanted to step out from his father's dark shadow. Jonny Coyne, who played Lord Janu, is quite good as a seedy antagonist; the way Coyne is always readily spinning the next shady deal in a scene makes him interesting. Martin Scorsese, who voiced Hugo Durant, absolutely stole the show early on for me; Scorsese as this fast-talking street vendor peddling food and information was a real treat.

However, the best performance came from Pedro Pascal, who played The Mandalorian/Din Djarin. This is a role that Pascal has woven between voicing and playing for some time, and it has become a staple in the Star Wars fandom for good reason. Pascal's Mando is a cool and collected figure, with a tremendous sense of justice. The way he breezes through a scene capable of leaning into intimidation or a quip is solid. However, it is the emotional bond worked between Mando and Grogu that Pascal does the best. The way he talks to Grogu is filled with love, the sort of love a parent would hold for their child. The part in this film where we get Pascal full of rage, eyeballing some Hutt crime lords, marks a high point in the film. However, this incredible performance isn't possible without the combined efforts of Brendan Wayne and Lateef Crowder, who do the majority of the physical performance for the Mandalorian.

Films that spin out of shows are always a bit complicated; sometimes, they don't even manage to spin away from the material well. In fact, continuing from that format is often a challenge from such a piece of media, as is wrapping up the events of the show. The Mandalorian and Grogu doesn't really have this problem; the issue here is that this is a film that does not always feel especially cinematic. The story is structured in a way that it feels like three episodes of the TV show smashed together. This creates quite a segmented low-stakes approach that doesn't always translate well to the big screen. In fact, this film really is so contained that it adds nothing major to the wider Star Wars canon, nor even to the journey of Din and Grogu. This is a fun adventure, but a very safe one made for all kinds of audiences who might have shown up for the ride. There are also a few too many moments where the feature lulls and the characters trek around doing very little. The whole sequence where Mando is at his home, having his ship worked on while farewelling Rotta, is a massive dip in the pacing, as an example. Overall, it's a fine film, but it's not the sort of thing Star Wars needs to continue growing as a franchise.

Steve Blum, who voiced Zeb Orrelios, is a nice touch for fans of Star Wars: Rebels, but has little to offer here; Blum's gruff bluster often falls into the backdrop of a scene. Hemky Madera, who played Commander Barro, was quite a dull antagonist for the film to start on; his tough edge often felt a bit two-dimensional. Stephen McKinley Henderson, who voiced Gatori, is quite a late character addition to the film; this swamp-dweller with a heart of gold just felt awkwardly jammed into the film. Shirley Henderson, who voiced The Anzelians, was a set of four that got a bit unbearable at times; a nice piece of comedy that just did not know when to pack it in.

If you've loved the sprawling nature of live-action and animated Star Wars, then you will have a great time with this film. I would give Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu a 7/10.

Mother Mary

 

This review may contain spoilers!

Mother Mary follows a pop star who has become disillusioned with her identity, and returns to her jilted former stylist to requisition a dress. 

I really love what this film started with, what it laid out for the audience. Mary is an absolute powerhouse performer, evoking Madonna or Lady Gaga in sound and style. But the tone of this feature is set by Sam, the former fashion designer friend who has survived the division of their friendship, ending some years ago. There is a comfort in them reuniting; they are larger-than-life figures who are admittedly quite grounded when you pair them together. History is in the room with them, you see it in the gentlest of moments, like when Sam asks after Mary's Mum. Watching Sam glide through the 'barn' (her own private design space) and try to pick Mary apart is riveting. Mary, being such a reserved, closed-door person while following Sam around like a lost puppy, is a good contrast to the scale of the performances we see her deliver. The wound that is this broken friendship is the best part of the script. I wish the film had known when to leave it grounded.

The visual work in Mother Mary is absolutely gorgeous; the performances she does on stage are so electric to watch. But it is those intimate moments in the barn that really count for something, lingering close-ups and the majestic way fabricwork is caught. The colour palette at work here is often a stylistic treat. However, it is the soundtrack that I must rave about the most. Charli XCX, Jack Antonoff and FKA Twigs are the names attached behind it, but it is Hathaway's incredible voice that brings to life one of the best assortments of music I've heard in a 2026 film.

Anne Hathaway, who played Mother Mary, is absolutely stunning in the title role; her musical performances command the screen and contrast nicely with her more withdrawn sense of self, which we come to know. Hunter Schafer, who played Hilda, really commands the screen when she has it; Schafer's turn as this high-functioning assistant to Coel works perfectly.

However, the best performance came from Michaela Coel, who played Sam Anselm. This is a role that feels imperious when we first meet her; she is a master of her dominion. Coel presents a woman with an eye for style and turning fashion into art. The way she performs voice-over and dialogue alike, as if she were delivering Shakespeare, is a powerful thing. She holds a lot of hurt, bitterness, derision and bile over what was lost and the feeling of being discarded. Sam is a character who yearned for Mary, who probably loved her friend and felt the loss of that immensely. Watching Coel lead and command across the film is a surprising but rewarding piece of performance. I watched Coel and Hathaway craft something raw and genuine; they collided with one another in this spectacular way.

I really came into this film not being sure what to expect from A24 here; elements of horror had been advertised leading up to Mother Mary's release. The thing that became apparent was that this was a film that wanted to play around in the strange; it just spent a long time struggling to get there. The pacing for this film was decidedly slow, with characters dialoguing and stumbling through slow scene work to negotiate a damaged relationship. But there's a moment in the movie that describes this film quite well. One of the characters notes that they are getting lost in metaphors, which is something this film glaringly suffers from. As Mary and Sam continue talking into the night, we learn that Sam had a vision of a ghost leaving her body. It's an odd moment that clashes with what we've been watching. Mary then hijacks the movie with a long metaphor about being chased by a ghost, an encounter with a psychic, and an intense accident at a concert. We muddy into self-mutilation and performing rituals. But the film does end in a manner that reminds us this is all there to just represent something, and if you weren't following along? Too bad, now here's Hathaway with a closing banger performance. The movie struggles with knowing how to end. Mary strips herself bare and performs, but it doesn't even capture the set-up painted earlier in the film. Sam's assistant gives this exorbitant monologue about Sam and Mary's dynamic that doesn't feel especially right coming from that character. It's a journey in disappointment, but it's one of the nicest-looking journeys in disappointment you are likely to watch this year.

It's clear that the music and performers are where the budget went because the special effects for the 'ghost' could have been a lot better. The formless red blob is an odd one, simple enough to evoke imagery of a dress, but often quite obvious in its presentation. The moments where it has to move or be pulled are often the points where it fails in appearance.

FKA twigs, who played Imogen, really struggles to act every time I've watched her in anything; her rabid turn as the psychic was almost laughable. 

Two powerhouse performances and one killer soundtrack get absolutely drowned in this overly complicated script. I would give Mother Mary a 4.5/10.

Obsession

 

This review may contain spoilers!

Obsession follows Bear, a mopey young guy who lives by himself and is holding a secret crush on his friend, Nikki. When his attempt to confess his feelings doesn't go to plan, Bear makes a wish on a One Wish Willow that Nikki would fall in love with him. The only problem? It works.

I was really impressed with what Obsession had to say for itself; it was an unhinged story that felt oddly relevant. This is an absolutely wild new take on supernatural horror. The idea of a wish becoming a point of horror is fascinating. The character of Bear is admittedly pretty tragic when we first meet him. He's not especially self-confident, he's living alone in his deceased grandma's house, and his cat dies within the opening minutes. Life isn't great for this young man, though it's not all bad either. Bear has this secretive crush on his friend, Nikki, who could not be less interested in Bear, from what we see. Bear never shows a lot of strength of character; he isn't honest with Nikki about the way he feels. Instead, he makes the choice to wish away her choice and for her to fall in love with him. Bear doesn't realise the wish would result in something real. How could he? But from here, we never really see the Nikki we know again for a very long time. Nikki's entire sense of self is ripped from her. She might look like the character we met at the start of the film, but her free will has gone, replaced with an all-encompassing sense of love for Bear. Bear is everything for her; her entire sense of being revolves around being with Bear and keeping Bear happy and in love. This film really explores the confines of toxic relationships and codependency, putting both leads through some significant extremes. However, the main driving force boils down to Bear still asking Nikki if being with him is really so bad; he still doesn't understand what his desire has stolen from Nikki. Even at the end, when Bear goes to kill himself to break the wish, he doesn't have the courage to free Nikki. He is regretful, but his sense of remorse comes from how the wish is affecting him. This film does a great job of showing how someone exerts their wants over another person, quashing that person's voice in the process. It's a modern horror that feels completely creative, exhilarating, and highly stressful to watch.

Curry Barker is a new, upcoming director that I think everyone needs to keep their eyes on after this. Obsession is a tightly framed, intimate piece of horror cinema. The camera arrests your gaze on faces, which is where all of the work is. It is absolutely gripping the way this film won't let you look away. The editing also sets a relatively steady pace, cutting from a steady to a frantic pace depending upon the nature of a scene. The score from this film is more droning than I tend to like, but it really cuts to the quick on those moments of hopelessness and captivity throughout. The soundtrack is something I thought was quite coy; the way indie tracks are used to make you think of a traditional romance feature early on is a great touch.

Michael Johnston, who played Bear, couldn't have been a better pick for the protagonist of this feature; Johnston is perpetually quite anxious and awkward, which cuts right to the cowardly manner of Bear. Cooper Tomlinson, who played Ian, is quite funny as Bear's best friend; Tomlinson really commands a scene when he's in it. Megan Lawless, who played Sarah, is a character that took some time to develop at first; but I found that Lawless and Johnston had some incredible chemistry, which resulted in some sincere tragedy. Haley Fitzgerald and Darin Toonder, who played Viola and Harry respectively, are some of the absolute funniest roles in the film; every time Bear went back to the Crystal store, I thought the employees were the best part of those scenes.

However, the best performance came from Inde Navarrette, who played Nikki. This is a very charismatic, cool character from the get-go. Navarrette defines Nikki as someone entirely confident, who has this really strong sense of her own identity and is a bit fearless. She is very creative and quite outspoken, willing to move on from something that stifles her to pursue her dreams. And then the wish happens, and Navarrette gets to go all out. What ensues is a full-tilt descent into madness. Navarrette has Nikki as a lying, gushing, crying and frantic mess - presenting a person who has completely shattered apart and is reconstituting themselves into a new person that can fit Bear's wish. She has moments where she plays to a 'dream girlfriend' archetype that suddenly tilts towards something almost demonic or possessed. Those moments of complete unnatural being, of otherness, are where Navarrette really shines. This character just loses pieces of herself more and more. It is a tragic performance, only made worse by those last few moments heading into the credits. Navarrette has given a horror film royalty-level performance that should be remembered forever.

Obsession is an interesting piece of indie horror that deserves every piece of praise it gets. It does, however, do a lot of what many modern indie horrors do. Which is to say, it really does try to do a lot of perturbing things for the sake of doing some really unsettling stuff. There are moments in this film, like the shrine to the dead cat or the cat being cooked into the sandwich, that are there to freak the audience out, but it's not super clear what relevance they have to telling the story this film is telling. I also thought the actual way we stumble into the One Wish Willow as a plot device is a bit simple in its construction. Our main character vaguely knows Nikki likes crystals, goes to buy her jewellery and then finds this vintage product that grants wishes. It's really easy, a bit funny, but not the best set-up for the whole thing this film hinges upon.

A horror film that is well and truly worth being obsessed with. I would give Obsession a 7.5/10.

In The Grey

 

This review may contain spoilers!

In The Grey, a small island nation is invaded by a high-tier client lawyer and her team of mercenaries to recoup the billion-dollar debt owed by the man who owns it.

This film functions like an action-film machine; it moves on a tight schedule and has a relentless rhythm. Everything about the operation we watch unfold is entirely tactical; emotion doesn't ever really bleed into it, it's just unrelenting. This is a film that wants to dismantle an antagonist; the components of storytelling are just a means to get there. It's extremely impressive watching the matter-of-fact way this film dissects the dissolution of a despot. There's a sort of thrill to the cocky soldiers running drills, backroom deals being postured and the helter-skelter run to extraction. I loved nothing more than when Rachel stopped for a beer, and we got to see the highly efficient way her team responds to a militant show of force from the enemy combatants.

Henry Cavill, who played Sid, is pretty entertaining as this lumbering manipulator; Cavill as the disruptor mercenary with an easy sense of charisma is a neat bit of casting. Eiza González, who played Rachel, is one of the most captivating performances in this feature; González is just as much of a combatant as the others, she is just sparring with dialogue. Fisher Stevens, who played William Horowitz, is quite a fun turn as the adversary lawyer who is watching his client's world fall apart; Stevens presenting an character who is struggling with a loss of control is often the best part of the antagonist storyline.

However, the best performance came from Jake Gyllenhaal, who played Bronco. I never watched The Covenant, but I must say there's a very natural pairing with Gyllenhaal and a Guy Ritchie script. This is a mercenary figure who feels quietly imposing, like he could snap into a dangerous display of force at any moment. I greatly enjoyed how aloof Bronco was as a character; that quick-talking wit you expect from a Ritchie film is entirely carried by Gyllenhaal here. Comfortably, the funniest role, while also being the most dynamic mercenary. I enjoyed how calculating this character was; his dry sarcasm often hides a figure who is deceptively cunning. If that's not enough, any time Gyllenhaal and Cavill get to riff off one another is a treat.

Guy Ritchie's recent film run hasn't been the most impressive; often, that feels like he's not finding anything fresh in the same tried and true elements. Yes, the characters make dry-humoured jokes, there's a high-stakes heist, and the boys with bravado live up to their cockiness. But somewhere within all of that, we've lost the actual sense of character. I watched this film, and I know I'm supposed to be rooting for Sid, Bronco and Rachel. But it's honestly pretty hard to care. These are characters who serve the action and are stoic individuals rolling out a very tactical plan. You never really get to see their sense of emotion, nor how they connect to one another genuinely. This film is often very detached, and even the main plot is just watching our heroes still money from one rich guy from another bunch of rich guys. There's also a significant exposition problem in In The Grey that aggravated me to no end. If a gun isn't firing, this is a film that just will not shut up. Every character has a voice-over, monologue or phone call in which they are dissecting and explaining elements of the plan or what they are doing. This turned what could have been an intriguing or tense story into a top-heavy info dump.

I'm used to a Guy Ritchie feature being quite a stylistic trip to the cinema, but this is quite visually lacking. I found the camerawork here staggeringly obvious; there's quite a structured approach to how action and confrontation are captured that I didn't enjoy. The editing moves at a steady pace that never really switches up on itself enough to draw in the viewer. The score for this film is a significant disappointment, given that the film struggles to create a sense of mood; the music in the feature rarely makes you feel the danger of those high-stakes scenes.

Carlos Bardem, who played Manny Salazar, is one of the absolute worst onscreen antagonists I've watched all year; Bardem's turn as a billionaire crime lord was entirely unbelievable. Rosamund Pike, who played Bobby Sheen, is finding some horrible roles lately; Pike as this sweat-soaked financial executive is a completely miscast character. Kristofer Hivju, who played Axel Olsson, could have had an interesting role; sadly, Hivju is reduced to a bland henchman figure. Darrell D'Silva, who played Braxton, is a gruff figure who doesn't quite fit his role; D'Silva is a character who opens this feature but doesn't leave much of an impression. 

Guy Ritchie tries to flex his muscles here, but he winds up showing us all the tired, old tricks. I would give In The Grey a 4.5/10.

Mortal Kombat II

 

This review may contain spoilers!

Mortal Kombat II is an adaptation of the Mortal Kombat video game franchise and a sequel to Mortal Kombat (2021). In this feature, the champions of Earthrealm must defeat Shao Kahn and his allies in a tournament, lest he claim Earth in conquest.

The character of Johnny Cage is offered up to be the more 'everyday' human for audiences to relate to this time around. He is quite a charismatic, funny figure, and it can be entertaining to see him grow and join the fight to save Earthrealm. This feature also boasts some really impressive fight sequences; it takes what worked well in the first film and really builds upon it. Watching some points in which the film does a reasonable job of tipping its hat to the games with a line, cameo or visual moment is a nice improvement from the original.

This film might not wow anyone from a story perspective, but it is a massive visual step up from the 2021 film. The cinematography here frames with intention, evoking video game style and also moving at a pace with some extremely impressive fight sequences. The visual effects finally look decent; there are some scenes where things can be stretched thin, but for the most part, this is a real feast for the eyes. I loved how visual backgrounds were styled, paired with flying razor hats, CGI throwing daggers and roaring infernos. The score is also a lot more engaging; it kicks the adrenaline into overdrive and makes the action as intense as possible.

Karl Urban, who played Johnny Cage, was a satisfying new addition to the series; Urban has a very natural, comedic charisma that enhances his character. Damon Herriman, who played Quan Chi, was extremely eerie as this unnatural sorcerer; Herriman's ability to play to the fantasy setting and the unusual, conflicting elements around him really set his performance apart. Hiroyuki Sanada, who played Hanzo Hasashi, decided that he was just here to impress this time around; Sanada plays into the tougher side of Scorpion, which works a lot better for him. CJ Bloomfield, who played Baraka, gives an immense creature performance; Bloomfield and Urban also have a great comedic dynamic with one another.

However, the best performance came from Josh Lawson, who played Kano. I cannot even begin to describe it, but Lawson has just found his way to a very natural fit with Kano. This rough-edged scoundrel is not necessarily someone to be trusted. Lawson presents an uncouth figure who cusses out allies and enemies alike. This film struggles to be funny, but Lawson sure doesn't. If there's a moment in which I actually found myself laughing the hardest, it was when Lawson was onscreen. Yes, we needed a little necromancy to get there, but thank goodness Kano is back. Josh Lawson was my favourite part of the first film, and he continues to deliver.

There's one thing that just seems to be true of Mortal Kombat films: there's not a lot of plot going on. A big part of this seems to stem from the fact that this is just adapting a fighting video game; the story is paper-thin in the first place. Yet, despite that, we seem to get ridiculous exposition dumps every other scene, paired with interdimensional travel, lizard people, magic and Elder gods. There's really no way into the story of this film; it's all quite outlandish and really caters to the players of the game. If you're an audience member who hasn't played before, good luck. The punching looks neat at least. This film doesn't always seem very confident in itself either; it really struggles with conveying who leads the feature. The marketing would tell you that it's Johnny Cage, but he seems like a piece in the ensemble at times. There are whole moments where Liu Kang or Kitana could be leading the film, but they aren't brought forward to that role either. So the only thing really leading this feature is that we're waiting for the big, muscular bad guy to get killed by the end. This film often lowers the stakes; characters who died in the first film are being resurrected left, right and centre. We even take a big trek into Netherealm, an Underworld for Mortal Kombat. This makes the threat of death hanging over our heroes' heads all the less significant, one of the few elements that lends an edge to these films. I also wouldn't recommend trying to work out the rules to the tournament; the characters try to explain it, but the rules are also extremely inconsistent. The dialogue, being a mixture of one-liners, quips and throwbacks to the video game, makes this some of the weakest writing I have experienced all year.

Adeline Rudolph, who played Kitana, has a lot of potential but never really manages to grasp it; Rudolph winds up being the exposition spout McNamee was in the original film. Martyn Ford, who played Shao Kahn, is a very generic antagonist role; this hulking threat is all presence but no substance. Tati Gabrielle, who played Jade, just doesn't have the chemistry with Rudolph to play their friendship and betrayal; Gabrielle is often too stoic in her scenes. Jessica McNamee, who played Sonya Blade, is surprisingly more boring than the original film; McNamee is easily the most bland fighter of the feature. Mehcad Brooks, who played Jax Briggs, struggles to make much of an impression this time around; Brooks is pushed to the background a lot more. Ludi Lin, who played Liu Kang, is quite an important character with an actor who can't play to that; Lin just doesn't have the bold presence to make himself known. Tadanobu Asano, who played Lord Raiden, is an extremely expressionless performance; Asano just doesn't feel big enough to be an 'Elder God'. Chin Han, who played Shang Tsung, is one of the more forgettable antagonists; he often seems like the surplus element in his scenes. Joe Taslim, who played Bi-Han, had quite a generic performance this time around; Taslim was reduced to a final fight scene with no real motive or purpose. Max Huang, who played Kung Lao, was a bit of a forced character return; he just doesn't feel like a big enough draw to play up his big fight sequence. Lewis Tan, who played Cole Young, has been demoted from protagonist for a very clear reason; Tan often struggles to play naturally in a scene. Ana Thu Nguyen, who played Queen Sindel, is in such a twisted role that makes little sense; this character is all over the place, and it's not very clear why. Sophia Xu and Desmond Chiam, who played Young Kitana and King Jerrod respectively, give a relatively simplistic intro to the film; this is a father/daughter intro that we've seen a thousand times before.

Sometimes, a really bad film begets a really bad sequel. I would give Mortal Kombat II a 4.5/10.

Hokum

This review may contain spoilers!

Hokum follows Ohm Bauman, a bestselling author who travels to a small Irish town to scatter the ashes of his parents. However, the hotel in which he stays contains untold horrors that Ohm will find himself entangled within.

This film is a completely eerie journey throughout, a horror that likes to keep you on your toes from one of the earliest scenes. This film takes Ohm, our leading author protagonist, and places him in an isolated and unusual setting. This rustic Irish hotel, which is our backdrop for the film, acts as a great setting to place the action. It has a gothic feel to it, but it also has a few layers that need peeling back. The Irish folklore element here of a witch stalking the local population and snatching young children away to Hell drummed up the fear early on, but seeing the telltale signs that such a creature had been trapped within these walls was much worse. The tilt into the second act is brilliant; we discover the murder of a likable character and descend into a locked room horror-mystery. Ohm races to not only free himself from being trapped but also to come to the bottom of the murder that he has stumbled upon. This movie will tease you with what is real and what isn't, but it walks the line between with a great deal of forethought. Seeing supernatural moments as an audience member, only for them to be ripped away with a plausible explanation, is brilliant. The way the protagonist actively makes use of what he has learned and then uses the supernatural horror against the main antagonist is an impressive conclusion, too. Hokum is that sort of horror that draws you in deep before sinking its fangs into you, and I could not look away (as much as I wanted to).

The design of Hokum is nothing short of impressive; it maximises the use of the creepy and claustrophobic hotel space to make a compelling horror setting. The camera work really toys with the urgency in those moments of pure terror. There is an extremely fast-paced sense of pacing that moves at a precise speed, but it is the cutting of those moments of tension that lands the most. I loved the score for Hokum; it was chilling and really set the heart pounding in those moments of peril.

Austin Amelio and Ezra Carlisle, who played the Conquistador and Boy respectively, are a nice glimpse into Ohm's psyche; Amelio really plays to the emotional guilt of the scene well. Adam Scott, who played Ohm Bauman, led this horror extremely well; Scott presents an author who is a bit of a jackass but also incredibly quick-witted. David Wilmot, who played Jerry, is quite surprisingly the heart of the film; Wilmot's eccentric drifter is the guiding centre for justice in this feature. Michael Patric, who played Fergal, is this gruff and impassive protector of the hotel and its occupants; Patric's role is often the most intimidating in any scene he is in. Will O'Connell, who played Alby, is quite a sweet character amongst the hotel staff; his earnest interest in Ohm is a nice contrast to Scott's bitterness. Brendan Conroy, who played Cob, isn't here much, but he sure leaves his mark; Conroy's storytelling around the witch is absolutely chilling horror in and of itself.

However, the best performance came from Peter Coonan, who played Mal. This is one of those antagonists who you can find across horrors and is almost always reviled. When the film first starts, and we meet Coonan, he portrays a lovely hotel manager with a lot of quiet charm. He is a relatively unassuming figure, but he breathes a sense of charisma that the film had been lacking up until that point. The tilt into seeing the brazen horror of his actual character, the crime he is willing to perpetrate, darkens things. From here, Coonan presents a man who is far more desperate; he wants old skeletons to stay buried, but is losing control over the situation. Watching the descent into Mal turning on all the other characters and eventually being claimed by the witch is where everything is amped to the max. Sometimes, the best horror antagonists are the mirror up to the worst of human potential.

Hokum is one of those films that just doesn't have a lot of characters to like within it. I found it difficult to find the person you want to root for in this cast because they all have some glaringly bad traits. Ultimately, you should be on Ohm's side, but he is a very prickly figure by design; regardless of his sympathetic background, his chief character trait is being a bit of a jerk to everyone. The final act plays things out a bit too much, faking the audience out at every turn. The bell scene is a really good example of something going on for just a little too long. I also don't think this film needed to hamfist the final question on whether the supernatural elements were real or not. By this point, enough work had been done for the audience to get their own impression of this. More than that, revisiting the Conquistador character to show Ohm's character growth felt a bit more than was strictly necessary.

The soundtrack often felt a bit simplistic to me; it was just a heavy-handed push to remind the audience that the action of this feature took place in Ireland.

Florence Ordesh, who played Fiona, is a character who often doesn't show much of her own personality; Ordesh's role serves to prop others up and then be a puzzle to be solved for the rest of the film. 

The perfect blend of tension and a good mystery, Hokum is going to be this year's Weapons. I would give Hokum a 7.5/10. 

The Devil Wears Prada 2

 

This review may contain spoilers!

The Devil Wears Prada 2 is the sequel to The Devil Wears Prada (2006) and rejoins our main characters twenty years on. When Runway magazine experiences a disastrous PR nightmare, Andy (a now award-winning journalist) is rehired to restore the company's reputation.

I actually really forgot how much fun Andy Sachs was as a character. I imagine, like most, the draw to watch Miranda Priestly once again was a huge pull to see this sequel. Yet, I could not help but fall into Andy's journey. This is a character who has grown by being an advocate, who chases stories of human struggle. She is still quirky, a little awkward and does not fit squarely into the mould of Runway magazine as Miranda styles it. But Andy is a very sincere fighter for justice, and loves Runway in her own way. Seeing how Andy, Miranda and some of the other characters fight for Runway is a really significant part of this movie. In a broader sense, thematically, this film uses the characters we know to explore the media industry's current struggles. From award-winning journalists being fired at the top of this film, to Runway facing mass layoffs, it is clear that the media as we know it has been distorted and changed. The idea of a physical magazine has all but perished, and the digital narrative is more about views than the content of the narrative. This sense of helplessness is perfectly capped off by one of the tech billionaire antagonists admitting A.I. and the like are much like the fires of Pompeii. Impossible to outrun, better to accept the lava. I really felt this film managed an endearing, comedic tone while also having so much to say about the media landscape of today in a very starkly honest way. Across the whole feature, the thing that sat so well with me and the large audience I was sat with was how nice it was to see these characters again, still themselves, just slightly matured. Watching Nigel and Andy befriend one another all over again, or Emily's own insecurities lash out against Miranda and Andy, felt like I had stepped through a portal back to the mid-2000s. This was a sequel that completely understood where it had come from and then proceeded to work itself for the modern day in a manner that made sense.

If you're going to do a The Devil Wears Prada sequel, it pays to go big or go home. From a visual design perspective, this film really understood how to frame these grandiose settings of luxury, spotlight the incredible costuming work and transport the audience to the world of designer fashion. I found the editing had an incredible, fun sense of pacing within a scene, especially when it could toy with multiple sequences running parallel to each other. It also has a soundtrack boasting some of the more interesting celebrity female musicians today, with Miley Cyrus, Dua Lipa, Laufey, Lady Gaga and Doechii all lending music to this ensemble of brilliant tracks.

Anne Hathaway, who played Andy Sachs, leads this film superbly; her character is so emotive that it's very hard not to connect with her. Emily Blunt, who played Emily, has that same cold edge that worked so well for her the first time; Blunt has this fragility going on beneath the surface, which I felt enhanced the role. Stanley Tucci, who played Nigel, very well stole the show countless times; I think Tucci is just a wonderful, heartfelt performer. Justin Theroux, who played Benji Barnes, is this ridiculous tech bro billionaire who is charmingly goofy at first; Theroux then adds this depraved worldview about AI and the future, which was a chilling moment. Kenneth Branagh, who played Stuart, is in one of his more domesticated roles here; Branagh and Streep are entirely sweet together. B.J. Novak, who played Jay Ravitz, is quite fun as a finance bro; there is a certain satisfaction in how ignorantly callous he can be. Lady Gaga, who played herself, is an absolutely stunning performer, to no one's surprise; watching her spar with Streep was a delight for me. 

However, the best performance came from Meryl Streep, who played Miranda Priestly. This role is the iconic element of The Devil Wears Prada films. Some parts just seem to come so naturally to Streep, bringing Miranda's superior presence to life. The almost comical way Miranda is such an elitist figure at the top of the world, meting out her worldview on others while also adjusting to change herself. Yet, I really found Streep came into her own in the back half of the film, where we really got to see under the surface of Miranda again. Watching her seethe and vie for power as Runway and all its staff are being ripped away is interesting. I also really enjoyed seeing her navigate the moments of betrayal from Emily, seeing that cunning edge of her character come to life. Streep then really gets to play this role as a bit of a mastermind, working alongside Hathaway and Tucci to make a thrilling and emotional final act. That scene of Miranda and Andy in the car together, talking about the book at the end, is why Streep makes this movie; it's why I will always come back to these movies.

The start of this sequel does take a while to get going; the world initially feels quite different. There are a lot of working pieces going on, blended with a lot of new faces; it's not a smooth transition to a fresh feature in that first act. I also felt this film was a little more prepared to play to a simple gag at times. There were some jokes here that felt a bit more on the nose or exaggerated than they would have been in the original feature.

I found this film very stylish with a strong eye behind the framing of the camera, but it wasn't without some points of weakness. I particularly hated how the lighting was captured in this film. There were entire scenes where the shadows dropping over characters concealed good acting or brought the visual quality of a scene down. 

Simone Ashley, who played Amari, barely feels like a character; the new, fashionable assistant just completely bereft of personality. Lucy Liu, who played Sasha Barnes, is quite a figurehead but not much of a role; Liu is here for the plot to reach a goal and not to really flex her acting chops. Tracie Thoms, who played Lily, is a returning friend character for Hathaway that felt poorly revisited; Thoms is a moment of nostalgia in a film that has moved past her. Caleb Hearon, who played Charlie, actually yanked me out of the film a bit; Hearon barely felt like an actor, and it was clear that his social media presence was why he had a role. Patrick Brammall, who played Peter, is quite an odd romantic pairing for Hathaway; I found his particular brand of humour struggled to mesh with the film. Rachel Bloom, who played Tessa, is quite an outlier in this; Bloom's publishing friend is often frenzied and running at a higher pace than she needs to be. Helen J Shen, who played Jin Chao, was the quietly charming side character that felt like a bad sequel move; Shen's role could be a bit too obvious in her comedic delivery. Tibor Feldman, who played Irv Ravitz, was a powerful role that had no gravitas; Feldman just wasn't commanding enough for the part. Larry Mitchell, who played Mack, was one of Andy's friends too many; he added nothing of value to this feature.

The absolute thrill I had watching a top-tier mid-2000s dramedy make this kind of a comeback. I would give The Devil Wears Prada 2 an 8.5/10.

Exit 8

 

This review may contain spoilers!

Exit 8 is an adaptation of the video game The Exit 8 by Kotake Create. It is a liminal space horror about a man who becomes caught in the same repeating underground subway corridor. He must spot anomalies as he walks through the tunnel, or risk becoming trapped forever.

This is a film that thrills by drumming up the fear where it can. What I enjoyed the most about Exit 8 was the introduction of the corridor itself, this liminal space that our leading characters found themselves trapped within. Those early scenes where our protagonist stumbles into the corridor are a sinking feeling, a moment of dread as you realise what is unfolding moments before he does. From here, we come to be thoroughly immersed in this sinister passage and are shown all of the horrors that it can yield. Those moments where our characters fail or guess wrong weigh heavily upon the audience. I think the ability to place you in the experience of those living this 'purgatory' is an impressive narrative feat.

I found I really enjoyed how this film captured a quite limited urban space. This is a very contained film by nature, and yet the camerawork always had you exploring the space with the same level of scrutiny as the main characters. The score for the film really ramped up the tension and the sense of helplessness. I adored the intensive use of 'Bolero, M. 81' to lurch us into the horror's repetitive nature.

Naru Asanuma, who played The Boy, was quite good as this young and stoic protagonist; he conveyed a lot early on without even needing to say anything at all. Kotone Hanase, who played the High School Student, was a deeply unsettling role; the way her role's personality twisted and turned was tough to watch.

However, the best performance came from Kazunari Ninomiya, who played the Lost Man. This was our leading protagonist for this film, and he helps pull us into what he's experiencing. When we first meet this role, he seems a bit muted, neither courageous nor firm in his sense of self. Ninomiya plays a man who is wrestling with the prospect of becoming a father, often terrified of the very idea. The course of the film forces him to confront the responsibility behind the thought, and take courage in the face of supporting his ex-girlfriend. Ninomiya's best quality in this film is how we see his character come to realise that he is trapped. It is a slow realisation, a terrifying one. Watching this Lost Man become tortured by the loop he finds himself trapped within is the significant element that has to work in all of this.

Exit 8 is an interesting premise; the liminal horror is a nice draw. However, it is a film that just keeps doing the same conceit over and over again. You wind up settling in as an audience member, because the same space and where the film is going with its use of this horror setting is very clear. There's not even very much fear that our protagonists won't escape, which is probably the missing piece to making this puzzle better. While I think Ninomiya does an incredible job with what he has, I also found the Lost Man a horrendous character to have to follow across the feature. He's inherently rather pathetic, and bumbles around being tortured by a sense of duty that doesn't seem so agonising. In fact, the way he internalises and really rakes himself over this thought of becoming a father gets to a point where you even lose a bit of sympathy for him. Even the fact that he is upset at himself for not confronting bad behaviour on the train is a hard moment to connect with. I didn't always find this film consistent; the Lost Man's asthma being a significant issue, then never really being one again, bothered me a lot. I don't feel like the Lost Man even changes enough as a person by the end of the film; he merely seems to have found common decency.

The visual effects for Exit 8 just weren't good enough for the space they took up. The rat scene alone was absolutely hilarious.

Yamato Kochi, who played the Walking Man, was really here to be more creepy than he was a character; he played a bit too strongly in the moments he got to break away and do his own stuff. Nana Komatsu, who played the Lost Man's Partner, never felt like a role; she was more of an impending question hanging over the narrative.

Exit 8 is a fairly unsubstantive film video game adaptation. I would give Exit 8 a 4.5/10.

Michael

 

This review may contain spoilers!

Michael is a biopic about the early career of Michael Jackson up to his final performance with the Jackson 5 on their Victory Tour.

Michael is a film that really comes down to portraying Michael's own insecurities. He was beaten significantly as a child, had an imbalanced relationship with his father and sheltered in childish fantasies. His rise to fame here is depicted as an effort to escape and believe in himself; to essentially break away from the Jackson family mould. Michael is oppressed by the control Joseph Jackson has over his family; there's a sense of fear there that permeates across the film. It's an interesting duel watching the pair try to resist and control the other. 

This is an Antoine Fuqua-directed film, so you know there's going to be a bit of style at play. There's a shot in this film of Jackson standing atop a car outside the CBS studio, which I think immortalises the visual nature of this feature. But if that's not enough, you can see just how much fun Fuqua had stitching the 'Thriller' music video scene together. The editing here is quite slick and sets an even pace to a film that could have otherwise felt slow. The strength of the film should be the music, and it often is. The selection of songs here might be obvious, but they are also clear staples of Michael Jackson's musical genius.

Jaafar Jackson, who played Michael, is a capable lead who has clearly worked hard for the role; his physicality as Michael Jackson showed him to be an incredible study. Nia Long, who played Katherine Jackson, is a quieter mother figure; the way Long built up Katherine's strength and resistance to Joseph across the film, I found admirable. Larenz Tate, who played Berry Gordy, shows a great reaction to Michael's rising star; the way Tate is a positive figure to Michael at an early point in the film is a nice note. Miles Teller, who played John Branca, is a real straight-shooter in this; Teller keeps a level playing field and guides Jackson well across their scenes together. Mike Myers, who played Walter Yetnikoff, has a great standout scene in this film; watching Myers play the part of strongarming MTV is a real blast.

However, the best performance came from Juliano Valdi, who played Young Michael. I don't think there will be a more powerful child performance this year. Which is a crazy thing to feel after I watched the NZ premiere of Hamnet earlier in the year (if you know, you know). Valdi's take on Michael Jackson as a child is electric; this is a young boy who feels the music he is performing to his very core. He moves about a set effortlessly; the dancing here will blow you away. But I loved how gentle and earnest he was. Valdi established that Michael is a bit off-kilter but also sincere. I also think he portrayed the struggle between father and son the best out of all the performers working that storyline. Watching Valdi barely hold himself together after a moment of abuse was like walking on crushed glass. This is a young actor who should go a long way; there's talent here in spades.

The issue with Michael is that it often feels safe, but more than that, it feels like it holds a substantial amount back. Biopic films that focus on musicians have been a constant staple of late, and Michael is one of the more basic ones I've watched. This is a simple rags-to-riches story, with minimal roadblocks and some mild interpersonal struggle scattered in. It's not trying to be inventive like Bohemian Rhapsody or Better Man were. The whole story feels quite condensed or even edited down. Chunks of life story have been ripped clean out, and what's left feels like the Michael Jackson story they're okay with telling us. Michael is a surface-level deep film that struggles to find detail in its narrative. It is also clear that Michael is an unusual protagonist. Yet the things that make him strange feel oddly taboo and like they can only be talked about so much. He hides in childish things, but the film seems afraid of examining the why there too closely. Michael really could have been a strong character study, but in truth, it just wants to celebrate the rise of Michael Jackson's celebrity.

Michael Jackson bought a range of animals in his time, and this film lightly covers this. The result of this is some absolutely uncanny CGI animals completely ruining the flow of this narrative from time to time.

Colman Domingo, who played Joseph Jackson, hits a pretty singular note across this; the mean-spirited, selfish father figure gets quite played out. Laura Harrier, who played Suzanne de Passe, is a figure who is there to be the tantalising door to the music industry; but Harrier isn't really playing much of a character here at all. KeiLyn Durrel Jones, who played Bill Bray, is framed as an odd father figure substitute to Joseph throughout the film; this is a performance that awkwardly observes but rarely feels vital to the scene. Kendrick Sampson, who played Quincy Jones, is entirely irrelevant to the plot of this film; Sampson and Jackson don't even pair nicely together in their scenes. 

There are pieces of a good story here amid the formulaic, bizarre musical biopic. I would give Michael a 6/10.

Fuze

This review may contain spoilers!

Fuze is a heist thriller following a military bomb disarmament unit locking down a few city blocks in London to disarm a recently unearthed WWII bomb. At the same time, a band of opportunistic thieves use the lockdown to perform a bank heist.

I found this an incredibly interesting thriller, one that was prepared to change itself to keep the audience hooked. At first, what we have is quite an operational high-stakes glimpse into a major event that forces military, law enforcement and other units of government to come together to protect innocent lives from this bomb threat. The additional element of a band of thieves steadily working throughout this lockdown also contributes to the tightly paced delivery, with their heist proving extremely methodical. At precise moments, you wonder whether this is the time the thieves would be caught, while at others, the risk of the bomb detonating escalates. The film is stacked with tiny micro-conflicts that shift things into tenser or more unpredictable spaces. Once the large pivotal shift of the film transpires, the dangerous elements really unravel, and our focus lies with the heist. Seeing double crosses play out, secrets become revealed and intensive shoot-outs play out, leave you guessing to the very end who our final triumphant characters will be. There is a strange sense of satisfaction in watching who walks away, regardless of how likable the characters themselves are. Fuze is a thriller where you might notice the cards it has up its sleeve, yet it spins its story very well.

This film has a very simplistic, everything precisely in the frame approach. We move and hold with the characters who lead the screen; this is a film that invites you to observe as it all unfolds steadily. The editing for Fuze is absolutely tight; it keeps an incredible pace and moves through scenes in a way that only serves the story that is being told. The score might not be the most impressive of 2026, but it manages to keep a tense feeling of anxiety going in crucial scenes.

Theo James, who played Karalis, is a pretty slippery criminal mastermind here; James' role is riding the stress and high of this caper the most out of anyone. Gugu Mbatha-Raw, who played Chief Superintendent Zuzana, is a very stoic leader; Mbatha-Raw does a good job at showing a reserved and effective figure of authority. Saffron Hocking, who played Military Sergeant Dootsie Keane, is a strong foil to Taylor-Johnson's more aloof lead; Hocking banters with her lines impressively while switching into a more abrasive military manner when called for. 

However, the best performance came from Aaron Taylor-Johnson, who played Will Tranter. This might be a smaller film than some of Taylor-Johnson's recent leading work, but it also reflects how much he has grown as a performer. There is no point in this film where you don't believe Will is a man of action who is seasoned in difficult scenarios such as this. Taylor-Johnson commands the military response scenes, barking orders and holding the unit together with a casual grit. Yet, it's the scenes where his command is challenged that I loved; watching him grow stubborn and upset was a nice switch. Seeing the sort of compassionate soldier he was and the path he chose in that final flashback was a great piece of acting from Taylor-Johnson to close us out.

Fuze is a well-written, precise piece of cinema that isn't too hard to follow. This is the sort of feature that signposts where it's going pretty hard, and I felt the mystery would have been richer with some more subtlety. The way this thriller becomes so heightened near the end, with a scrabble for success, felt a bit messier than the polished first half. The final flashback scene, paired with the humorous credits roll, felt a bit unnecessary. It was an endpoint that had me wishing the film just trusted the audience to be smart enough to read it. The use of comedy before a full cut to credits just seemed tonally jarring when compared to the movie we had been watching.

The soundtrack for this film had some cool tracks, but a really strange mix of genres that made no real sense. The jump from reggae to a folk-rock thing really had me scratching my head.

Sam Worthington, who played X, isn't much more than a big grunt with a few more lines than most; whatever leading man talent Worthington used to wield has abandoned him here. Elham Ehsas, who played Rahim, has his own subplot that doesn't intrigue as much as the others; Ehsas is really held on his own to tell his story, which struggles.

A tense play-by-play that turns into a lively heist thriller. I would give Fuze a 7.5/10.

Outcome

This review may contain spoilers!

Outcome follows Reef Hawk, a famous Hollywood actor who has been performing since he was six. Poised to come off a five-year hiatus after a stint in rehab, Reef is suddenly confronted with the threat of blackmail that could shatter his entire existence.

I enjoy that this film is about image at its very core. Reef is quite a fragile figure; he is held together by the thought that he is admired and thought of as a 'good' celebrity. Across Outcome, we watch Reef feverishly wrestle his cellphone out of his pocket and Google how well-liked he is, often by searching up negative things about himself. When people say damaging things about who he is in this movie, he spirals into a depressive, frenzied or rageful state. Even when face-to-face with the man who was blackmailing him, Reef asks if the guy hates him. It's the only thing Reef can understand; his own reputation and image are the very things his being revolves around.

The soundtrack for the feature serves it rather well; playing that moment of final growth out on 'How Lucky' by Kurt Vile was that light, contemplative feeling this film needed.

Keanu Reeves, who played Reef Hawk, actually really goes for it with this role; Reeves' lead protagonist is a constantly anxious and hopeless mess. Cary Christopher, who played Skylar Williams Wood, is a prodigal young talent; Christopher only has one scene here, but his parody of an overconfident young actor is hilarious. Laverne Cox, Roy Wood Jr., Atsuko Okatsuka, who played Virginia Allen-Green, Reverend Leondrus Carter and Unis Kim respectively, are a hilarious group together; they really play up the absurdity of a Hollywood image crisis team. Welker White, who played Savannah, is a biting moment of realness in all this; White's painful remarks about how hurt Reef left her and how damaging he was salted the earth of this film. Matt Bomer and Cameron Diaz, who played Xander and Kyle respectively, struggled with the material at times but really showed their experience when it counted; the scene where Diaz loses her temper and Bomer confesses why he is Reef's friend, is powerful stuff.

However, the best performance came from Martin Scorsese, who played Richie 'Red' Rodriguez. I've really enjoyed the more recent light forays into acting from Scorsese; if you haven't seen him in The Studio, that is a must-watch. What I enjoyed about Scorsese as Red, this washed-up manager for child actors, is that Scorsese makes Red feel seasoned in the industry. You believe Red isn't a big player; he's just a guy who works out the back of a bowling alley. But he has doggedly hustled at his work for years, in a way that has often felt thankless. When Scorsese admonishes Reeves and tells him that he tried his best for him, it's a real moment of vulnerability. The first this film ever really shows. Watching Scorsese confide that he tried to save his client from the drugs, all while beating himself up for not doing enough, is a genuine moment of feeling in this entire feature. But adding that confession layer from Scorsese that he is so sad that none of his clients ever reached out to him again after they left is a bit tragic. Ending the film on the reconnection between Scorsese and Reeves is the smartest thing this film achieves.

Outcome is the sort of film that you put on and almost immediately question who on Earth it's actually for. This film is the sort of story that feels like it's made in Hollywood for Hollywood. Jonah Hill's take on Hollywood celebrity satire is one of the more niche experiences I have had watching cinema. There is a vapid reflection on actors being afraid of being cancelled in the digital age, jumping at the sight of a cellphone camera or a tabloid rumour. Characters jape about the #MeToo movement and being a victim of sexual harassment in a way that feels like it's playing with a line that doesn't really need to be crossed. Outcome wants to be a comedy more than it wants to be a drama, but the humour feels extremely tailored to the crowd of people who are actually making the film. When it isn't the comedy often degrades itself into sex or drug-related material, with one scene putting Ira on a toilet seat while Reef continues to chat with him. This film has characters making racist jokes while then darting away from that material in the same breath to show how 'opposed to racism' they are. It's a film that feels more than a bit senseless and warped morally. There's an implication that Reef's manager, Ira, also represents Kanye West and Kevin Spacey, as there are monolithic photo frames of them all through his offices. As a character, I never found myself entirely understanding or caring for Reef very much, and the film never manages to change my mind on that. Reef is quite a shallow character with a strange life and people around him who act extremely artificially. Everything about this film is performative, and you wonder if there's even any sincerity in the message. Knowing that Jonah Hill made this, while watching him pantomime a morally bankrupt Hollywood manager, often feels more warped than funny.

The way Outcome is shot is absolutely hideous. You are either all too aware of the artifice, or you're too aware that this film has the worst lighting crew working in the big year 2026. The editing is an inconsistent series of cutting choices that often stilt or lend an awkward effect to the pacing. The score for Outcome is grating and lends no extra emotional weight to the feature.

Jonah Hill, who played Ira Slitz, is the biggest letdown in his own movie; Hill gallivants around scenes like he thinks he is the funniest person in any given room. Ivy Wolk, who played Sammy, is here to be Reeves' onscreen daughter, but the pair have no chemistry; Wolk has this dry, tinny delivery that falls on its face. David Spade and Kaia Gerber, who played Buddy Gomorrah and Oksana respectively, are important additions to the film but serve their purpose poorly; Spade looks completely washed out here. Susan Lucci, who played Dinah Hawk, really doesn't know how to ground her character at all; Lucci feels like she is often playing her character too big and fake for the scene. Drew Barrymore, who played herself, has clearly been out of the acting game too long; she just went over the top as her first instinct.

This incredibly talented cast doesn't hide the fact that this is nothing more than a thin vanity project for Jonah Hill. I would give Outcome a 1.5/10.

The Drama

 

This review may contain spoilers!

The Drama follows a happily engaged couple, Emma and Charlie, who are due to be married. At a wine tasting evening with their friends, they play a game naming the worst thing they have ever done. However, when Emma shares hers, the ramifications on all of their lives could be severe indeed.

This film has one key thing to do that ends the first act and catapults us into the second. The Drama has to tell us exactly what the drama is. If there is anything this movie did incredibly well, it was this pivotal moment. The film has given us the fluffy meet-cute, dates and relatable love story that is a little too sweet. It has also shown us that some of the characters are a bit inane, snobbish and have their own conceits. It's the perfect calamitous cocktail for a moment of confession, in which we get this varied mix of the worst things our main cast of characters has ever done. Emma admitting to planning and nearly executing a school shooting silences the room and immediately erodes that feeling of golden romance. Suddenly, tension is high, and the mystery becomes how it is all going to play out. That then becomes the solid strand moving forward; this palpable feeling of tension as you wonder how the gossip spreads and when the bubble will inevitably burst.

Unsurprisingly for an A24 film, this is a highly aesthetic piece of cinema. It has a very indie romance take on New York romance, but then bubbles into intensive uncomfortable shots as the plot unravels into its more foreboding back half. The soundtrack for The Drama is a light offering, but it has these gentle tracks that also suit the indie style of the film. I found 'Inside Out' by Jesse Rae to be the bright theme for everything right in Emma and Charlie's relationship.

Robert Pattinson, who played Charlie, seems to be in his element with a role like this; Charlie is a very aloof figure who absolutely crumbles across the duration of this film. Mamoudou Athie, who played Mike, is a friend character I quite enjoyed across this feature; Athie really tries to settle tensions and is often on the fringe, feeling pretty perturbed by everyone else. Hailey Gates, who played Misha, is this very impassive figure who plays well against Pattinson's ramping fears; Gates is the perfect ingredient to push Emma and Charlie's relationship over a very precarious edge.

However, the best performance came from Zendaya, who played Emma. This character is a really bright and loveable spark from the moment we meet her at the start of the film. Zendaya plays Emma as being entirely head over heels, it's almost to a point where it feels a bit dorky, as her friends indicate to her. Yet Emma is this character who seems to take action and move forward; she has her own temperaments and isn't initially swayed by others. Zendaya plays the drunken confession of admitting she planned a school shooting brilliantly; it bursts out of her in a fairly innocent and naive way. The fallout from that point is that we see Zendaya really spiral out of control from here; she overthinks every social interaction and despairs that her relationship is over. She plays to the tension of every scene, and wilts at becoming this pariah. But I also think the layer of complexity that Zendaya brings that sets her above is how she plays Emma as this redemptive figure. Even at their lowest point, Emma is the character who brings the hope that this relationship can be saved and endure.

I think the reveal of the drama behind The Drama is where the film peaks. From there, I really struggled with what this film had to say for itself. The idea that Emma committed to planning and nearly executing a school shooting as a young teenager is shocking enough to make a good twist. From here, you might expect the movie to say something, anything, about school shootings and gun violence. However, beyond Charlie noting how many shootings there are in the US in a year, this film just loosely wags its finger and says gun violence is bad. Which is really quite a simple and expected position to take. The Drama is more focused on the interpersonal nature of this confessional, asking whether Emma should be condemned for what she almost did some years ago. It's a strange moment for the plot to utilise quite a serious problem within American society, then put it to the side to make a film that is more in line with asking if people are worth getting a second chance, regardless of their actions? This film has a very stilted pacing that snaps between imaginary scenarios, dream sequences, flashbacks and jump cuts that craft a very strange type of pacing to watch. The film also wields these characters who seem to live quite an elevated life; it's very glamorous while still feeling quite domestic. There's a bit of an academia air to the whole thing that creates this superior sense when discussing morality; the characters hardly feel like arbiters of justice that an audience can relate to. When the characters confess to the worst things they have done, one of Emma's friends nearly killed someone through their actions. Yet this friend is never condemned in the same way that Emma is, a plot moment I really struggled to make heads or tails of. The film snowballs into everyone taking increasingly worse actions to muddy the moral implications of the story, with Charlie even cheating on Emma at one point. By the time the wedding implodes itself in this grotesque way, I don't think anyone felt shock so much as they felt repulsion. The film offers up crumbs of a happy ending, but I struggled to understand if I should even really care about the fate of Emma and Charlie by this point.

The editing for The Drama is a scattered nightmare, with cuts that confuse and divert the audience, constantly destroying the pacing. I also found the score for the feature to be a frenetic, droning sound that might have heaped on the anxiety of certain scenes, but had no business being described as anything 'musical'.

Alana Haim, who played Rachel, is here to be the frosty friend who is also a bit of a bitch; but Haim never really seems to grasp how to do this in a particularly grounded manner. Hannah Gross, who played Alice, is a very reserved figure who feels a bit superfluous at times; Gross' relationship with Zendaya and Haim is really poorly defined and perhaps not needed at all.

A strange, reckless movie that utilises a major systemic American issue for an edgy take on interpersonal relationships. I would give The Drama a 3.5/10.

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie

 

This review may contain spoilers!

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is a direct sequel to The Super Mario Bros. Movie (2023). In this feature, Bowser Jr. is on a galaxy-wide rampage and wants his father returned to him. It will take our heroes, and some new friends, to stop the Bowser family and their Koopa army.

I really liked that it felt like Princess Peach got to be active in this story. The good thing about a Nintendo property film is that all of these characters are equally exciting and can command their own story. Peach undergoes a real heroic arc, venturing throughout the galaxy to save her sister and uncover the mysteries of her past.

The one thing I have to say positively for Illumination is that they have really turned out their A game for designing these Mario movies. The colour palettes are entirely vibrant, and everything really pops with a varied colour scheme. There is plenty of background detail to look for here, and the animation team has really worked to bring the world of Mario and his friends to life. Tyler Bates' score is a real love letter to the cartoonish video games, with tribute to those original game scores woven through his adventurous musical arrangement.

Anya Taylor-Joy, who voiced Princess Peach, is really fighting a great fight this time around; Taylor-Joy gets to present Peach as a bit of a stubborn and capable warrior. Brie Larson, who voiced Rosalina, is this really gentle and motherly figure to the stars; yet Larson also makes it clear that no one in their right mind messes with someone as tough as Rosalina. Keegan-Michael Key, who voiced Toad, has a very dry wit that works well; Key's Toad is always up for adventure even when he isn't the most equipped for it. Charlie Day, who voiced Luigi, suits the plumber brother more ready to jump at his own shadow; Day's take on Luigi is rather stressed out yet full of admiration for his brother.

However, the best performance came from Benny Safdie, who voiced Bowser Jr. As far as antagonists go, Safdie has really stepped up the game in this sequel. Bowser Jr. can seem like a mean-spirited kid who lashes out in tantrum-like ways. However, Safdie does a good job of following through and actually sculpting him to be an intimidating villain. This is a Bowser who just wants the approval of his father and his father's love. Safdie leans into the playful wickedness of the role, creating an animated villain who actually stands against our heroes well.

The Super Mario Galaxy Movie is much like the first Mario movie; it barely has any plot to speak of. These films are made by Illumination, which famously treats its animated features like products, and less like art forms. If you don't believe me, perhaps just reflect on the fact that we almost have as many Minions movies as we do Despicable Me movies now. This is a film that starts off with hints of a grander, nefarious plot, but in reality, Bowser Jr. just wants Bowser back. Princess Peach flies all over the place to find her sister. The Mario Bros. eventually stumble after her. Yoshi is just kinda introduced and then becomes a part of the gang. Bowser's character development is weirdly stripped away, and he regresses back to being a villain. Even the final battle sidelines our main antagonists for a monster fight that didn't seem especially well set up. A lot of this movie wants you to see and be interested in the familiar locations, characters and objects of the various Nintendo games. It dangles them out in front of you with a big grin, hoping the memory of the past is enough to have you hooked. This coming out after Pixar had just released one of its most imaginative films in years is such a stark contrast.

The soundtrack for this movie has a few strange moments of hip-hop or modern tracks that just don't really mesh with the sort of story being delivered.

Glen Powell, who voiced Fox McCloud, is a moment where the actor is trying to impress upon you that his character is cool; Fox feels awkwardly stuffed into this movie to mirror what Donkey Kong achieved in the last one. Chris Pratt, who voiced Mario, just doesn't have a voice that makes me think of Mario; the accent inflection Pratt does is quite painful. Jack Black, who voiced Bowser, feels like he's only really capable of playing to this strange comedic take on the villain; Black often sounds more like himself than the character he is attempting to portray. Donald Glover, who voiced Yoshi, feels more like a marketing move than anything else; Glover voicing something as innocuous as Yoshi is a waste of time. Kevin Michael Richardson, who voiced Kamek, is quite an annoying henchman figure; his grating presence in the Bowser scenes really brings those down. Luis Guzmán, who voiced Wart, is a barely notable antagonist role; he does some remarkably unimpressive posturing to ignite a fight scene.

Mamma mia, here we go again. I would give The Super Mario Galaxy Movie a 3.5/10.